| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Portability issues in shm_mq |
| Date: | 2014-03-18 20:14:38 |
| Message-ID: | 26354.1395173678@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Meh. I think you're putting a bit too much faith in your ability to
>> predict the locus of bugs that you think aren't there.
> Well, I'm open to suggestions.
As a suggestion: it'd be worth explicitly testing zero-byte and one-byte
messages, those being obvious edge cases. Then, say, randomly chosen
lengths in the range 100-1000; this would help ferret out odd-length
issues. And something with message sizes larger than the queue size.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua Yanovski | 2014-03-18 20:18:24 | Re: [WIP] Better partial index-only scans |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-03-18 20:11:26 | Re: First-draft release notes for next week's releases |