"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Jun 4, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It seems we have two reasonable possibilities for 8.4: revert that
>> patch and keep contrib/intarray's behavior the same as it was, or leave the
>> patch in and document that there was a behavioral change.
> You can't keep the patch and update intarray to behave like it did
> before?
Uh, no. The point is that intarray's operators behave(d) differently
from the core operators.
regards, tom lane