| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
| Date: | 2020-04-04 22:24:34 |
| Message-ID: | 26351.1586039074@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 11:51 PM Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've translated the non-vote comments into estimated votes of -0.3, -0.6,
>> -0.4, +0.5, and -0.3. Hence, I revoke the plan to back-patch.
> FWIW, I also think that it would be better not to back-patch.
FWIW, I also concur with not back-patching; the risk/reward ratio
does not look favorable. Maybe later.
> Last but not least, I would like to join with others in expressing my
> thanks to you for your hard work on this problem.
+1 on that, too.
Shouldn't the CF entry get closed?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2020-04-04 22:32:12 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-04-04 21:54:11 | Re: backup manifests and contemporaneous buildfarm failures |