From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info |
Date: | 2004-06-13 17:22:05 |
Message-ID: | 26349.1087147325@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> Not sure how to fix this -- I'm not even sure what the exact problem is,
> because it's trying to insert the oid of a toast table in
> pg_class_oid_index during the first ALTER TABLE ... CREATE TOAST TABLE.
> Why would it see an old tuple with the same value, I don't know.
This is probably an UPDATE operation not an INSERT. There are quite a
few paths through CREATE TABLE that involve repeated updates of the
new pg_class row.
I would think however that these changes would occur as successive
commands of a single transaction, not as subtransactions, unless you've
done something odd to CommandCounterIncrement.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-13 17:24:05 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Clean up generation of |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-13 17:19:18 | Re: Release 7.4.3 branded |