Re: Nonexistent pid in pg_locks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Uhl <joeuhl(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nonexistent pid in pg_locks
Date: 2009-07-08 19:00:57
Message-ID: 26333.1247079657@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Joe Uhl <joeuhl(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Jul 8, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What exactly did you do to "kill" those processes? Do you remember
>> whether any of them happened to have PID 10453?

> I used "kill pid1 pid2 pid3 ..." (no -9) as root. Unfortunately I do
> not recall if that pid was one of the processes I killed and not
> enough scrollback in this screen to see. It is a
> ShareUpdateExclusiveLock lock though and I definitely only killed
> vacuum/analyze pids so thinking there is a very high chance of 10453
> being one of them.

Hmm. In any case that shouldn't have led to a lock left hanging.
Assuming that it was a regular and not autovacuum, do you know what
the exact command would have been? (In particular, FULL, ANALYZE,
etc options)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Uhl 2009-07-08 19:08:24 Re: Nonexistent pid in pg_locks
Previous Message Joe Uhl 2009-07-08 18:56:29 Re: Nonexistent pid in pg_locks