From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | PegoraroF10 <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Operator is not unique |
Date: | 2019-09-30 14:54:15 |
Message-ID: | 26283.1569855255@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> The list of extensions that you sent earlier are fairly common. I would
> not expect them to be contributing to the below otherwise there would
> have been more reports of what you are seeing.
A quick "grep" shows that there is nothing named "day_inc" in core
Postgres nor any of the contrib extensions. So this is something
homegrown. It looks to me like somebody wanted a plus operator
that would add numerics and dates/timestamps/timestamptzs, and
figured they could be lazy and make one operator using "anyelement".
But this will capture numeric plus *anything*, so it was not a
good idea. I'd recommend dropping the use of anyelement and just
making three non-polymorphic operators.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marco Ippolito | 2019-09-30 16:01:17 | Re: "Failed to connect to Postgres database" |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2019-09-30 14:39:33 | Re: Operator is not unique |