Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?
Date: 2005-07-04 04:43:43
Message-ID: 26254.1120452223@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> OK. Does anybody else have thoughts on removing the PG_ARGISNULL()
> checks? Neil suggests removing them because they'd be unnecessary,
> but I'm concerned about people who'd use the new code with old
> catalog entries that aren't STRICT (e.g., restored from a dump).

I concur with leaving them in for awhile. They aren't all that
expensive ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-07-04 04:51:17 Re: Schedule for release 8.1
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-07-04 04:29:28 Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?