| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |
| Date: | 2013-12-03 19:31:17 |
| Message-ID: | 26239.1386099077@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> When it comes to dump/reload, I'd much rather see a mechanism which uses
> our deep understanding of the extension's objects (as database objects)
> to implement the dump/reload than a text blob which is carried forward
> from major version to major version and may even fail to run.
Note that we're already doing that in the binary_upgrade code path.
I agree that generalizing that approach sounds like a better idea
than keeping a text blob around.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-12-03 19:33:16 | Re: Time-Delayed Standbys |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-12-03 19:29:32 | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |