Re: Function with defval returns error

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, rushabh(dot)lathia(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Subject: Re: Function with defval returns error
Date: 2008-12-15 13:43:00
Message-ID: 26230.1229348580@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Rushabh Lathia wrote:
>> I think this should not return error as the input args here is
>> timestamp... inputs?

> In theory yes, but it's currently not that smart.

This is truly horrid. Was that patch *really* ready to commit?
I noticed some comments added to polymorphism.sql that certainly
look like there's still a lot of half-bakedness in it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2008-12-15 13:44:10 rules regression test failed on mingw
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-12-15 13:36:54 Re: Restore enforce_generic_type_consistency's breaks a farms