From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [v9.4] row level security |
Date: | 2013-09-04 15:22:39 |
Message-ID: | 2620.1378308159@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Right. IMHO, this new feature should be similarly simple: when an
>>> unprivileged user references a table, treat that as a reference to a
>>> leakproof view over the table, with the RLS qual injected into the
>>> view.
>> And for insert/update/delete, we do what exactly?
> The same mechanism will prevent UPDATE and DELETE from seeing any rows
> the user shouldn't be able to touch.
No, it won't, because we don't support direct update/delete on views
(and if you look, you'll notice the auto-updatable-view stuff doesn't
think a security-barrier view is auto-updatable).
AFAICT, to deal with update/delete the RLS patch needs to constrain order
of qual application without the crutch of having a separate level of
subquery; and it's that behavior that I have zero confidence in, either
as to whether it works as submitted or as to our odds of not breaking it
in the future.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-09-04 15:23:25 | Re: 9.4 regression |
Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-09-04 15:21:14 | Re: [v9.4] row level security |