| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES |
| Date: | 2020-05-19 13:19:52 |
| Message-ID: | 26190.1589894392@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:41:39AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>>> This has been committed just after beta1 has been stamped. So it
>>> means that it won't be included in it, right?
>> Right.
> Still, wouldn't it be better to wait until the version is tagged?
Yeah, that would have been better per project protocol: if a tarball
re-wrap becomes necessary then it would be messy not to include this
change along with fixing whatever urgent bug there might be.
However, I thought the case for delaying this fix till post-wrap was kind
of thin anyway, so if that does happen I won't be too fussed about it.
Otherwise I would've said something earlier on this thread.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2020-05-19 13:28:34 | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-05-19 13:07:40 | Re: Warn when parallel restoring a custom dump without data offsets |