From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3 |
Date: | 2007-11-16 05:40:31 |
Message-ID: | 26190.1195191631@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> - --On Friday, November 16, 2007 00:03:46 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> wrote:
>> Either that or we try to move up all supported back branches to the
>> latest autoconf version; which might be a good idea but it scares me
>> a bit.
> That would be a good idea, and really simply things ... FreeBSD seems to have
> drop'd off support for all but 2.13 and 2.61 ...
Perhaps so, but it'd cost us a fair amount of up-front work to verify
that we don't break the back branches by updating their configure
scripts. Not something I want to touch on a last-minute basis ;-)
[ digs for a moment... ] According to my notes we are using autoconf
2.53 for versions 7.3-8.0 and 2.59 for the later branches. So 2.13
is already out of the picture. It might be that 2.53 to 2.59 to 2.61
is not all that big a jump in reality, but I've got to say that it
scares me when I read commit-log entries that report ten thousand lines
worth of diffs in a 20K-line script ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-11-16 05:46:44 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3 |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-11-16 05:25:51 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-11-16 05:46:44 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3 |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-11-16 05:25:51 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3 |