Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status
Date: 2009-08-13 18:09:17
Message-ID: 26187.1250186957@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> Now admittedly it's not hard to screw yourself with a careless manual
>> move of xlog, either. But at least the database didn't hand you a knob
>> that invites clueless frobbing.

> So really rather than a GUC we should have a utility for moving the xlog.

Yeah, that would work. Although it would probably take as much verbiage
to document the utility as it does to document how to do it manually.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2009-08-13 18:09:29 Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities)
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-08-13 17:55:36 Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status