| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Claudio Natoli" <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: APC/socket fix (final?) |
| Date: | 2004-03-26 19:11:27 |
| Message-ID: | 26161.1080328287@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> The third option is to redefine all these functions into our own, and
> implement our own emulation layer. This means our own select(), send(),
> recv() (more? I don't think so). And have these call the native winsock
> APIs (WSAEventSelect(), WSASend(), WSARecv() etc). These functions are
> designed to work in an APC environment.
Pardon me for not having paid close enough attention, but what versions
of select() and friends are we relying on now? Is it really reasonable
to think that we can do a better job without a large amount of effort?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-03-26 19:29:27 | Re: APC/socket fix (final?) |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-03-26 18:56:41 | Re: APC/socket fix (final?) |