| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Sverre H(dot) Huseby" <sverrehu(at)online(dot)no>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: So we're in agreement.... |
| Date: | 2000-05-08 16:40:32 |
| Message-ID: | 2615.957804032@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> We have SSL capability already. I don't feel an urge to reinvent SSL.
> Sounds pretty reasonable to me. But if SSL is already there, don't you have
> import/export problems?
No, because we don't include SSL in the distribution. There are just
hooks to call it.
(At one time there were export regs against even having hooks for crypto
:-(, but I believe they finally agreed that was pretty silly...)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-05-08 16:54:26 | Re: So we're in agreement.... |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2000-05-08 16:34:43 | Re: So we're in agreement.... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-05-08 16:54:26 | Re: So we're in agreement.... |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2000-05-08 16:34:43 | Re: So we're in agreement.... |