Re: FDW, too long to run explain

From: auxsvr <auxsvr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FDW, too long to run explain
Date: 2019-02-17 19:43:05
Message-ID: 2614341.vqdVxeSBeF@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sunday, 17 February 2019 20:58:47 EET Jeff Janes wrote:
> A question for the PostgreSQL hackers would be, Is it necessary and
> desirable that the EXPLAIN be issued in the same transaction as the
> eventual DECLARE and FETCHes? I don't think it is. I guess if the foreign
> side table definition got changed between EXPLAIN and DECLARE it would
> cause problems, but changing the foreign side definition out of sync with
> the local side can cause problems anyway, so is that important to preserve?

Won't separate transactions cause issues if the statistics of the table change in the meantime in a way that affects the plan?

> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
--
Regards,
Peter

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2019-02-17 21:00:15 Re: [External] Re: FDW, too long to run explain
Previous Message Vijaykumar Jain 2019-02-17 19:36:56 Re: [External] Re: FDW, too long to run explain