Re: pg_dump and sequences - RFC

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump and sequences - RFC
Date: 2000-09-28 15:29:42
Message-ID: 26130.970154982@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> This would be something I'd like to do as a learning exercise. However,
> aren't we 2 days from beta? Is this enough time to learn how to add a
> function to the backend?

In practice, you've probably got a week. I believe Marc is planning to
be out of town for a week starting tomorrow, and he's not going to be
pushing out a beta till he gets back.

(Besides, I'm not quite done with subselect-in-FROM ;-))

I'd recommend going for the function.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-09-28 15:52:24 Re: pg_dump and sequences - RFC
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-09-28 15:17:36 Re: pg_dump and sequences - RFC