Re: Revamped PL/pgSQL Documentation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Revamped PL/pgSQL Documentation
Date: 2001-03-16 20:44:01
Message-ID: 26119.984775441@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu> writes:
> The part that confuses me is the end. I assume that if you specify
> DEFAULT you must specify a value. Am I right in understanding that
> notation as meaning:

> name [ CONSTANT ] type [ NOT NULL ] [ DEFAULT value | := value ];

> or perhaps it could be written like this:

> name [ CONSTANT ] type [ NOT NULL ] [ { DEFAULT | := } value ];

Use the source, Luke ... a quick look into plpgsql's gram.y shows that
the latter is correct, ie, 'DEFAULT' and ':=' are interchangeable
introducers for an initialization expression.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Crotwell 2001-03-16 21:04:16 suggestion for admin "If you are upgrading"
Previous Message Roberto Mello 2001-03-16 19:52:33 Re: Revamped PL/pgSQL Documentation