From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Simplifying replication |
Date: | 2010-10-27 19:38:17 |
Message-ID: | 26115.1288208297@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Except that changing wal_keep_segments doesn't require restarting
>>> the master.
>>
>> Our docs say that it does:
>> This parameter can only be set in the postgresql.conf file or on
>> the server command line.
> That sounds as though a reload would do it; I don't see that
> indicating that a restart is needed.
That is, in fact, our standard boilerplate wording for SIGHUP
parameters.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-10-27 19:40:12 | Re: max_wal_senders must die |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-27 19:33:55 | Re: max_wal_senders must die |