Re: HISTORY fixes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: HISTORY fixes
Date: 2002-10-02 18:46:36
Message-ID: 26103.1033584396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> P.S. Rather than updating HISTORY in one go before we make a release,
> what does everyone think of the idea of updating HISTORY whenver a
> patch that makes a user-visible change is committed?

Peter already set up a convention for that: patch the short list near
the front of doc/src/sgml/release.sgml.

HISTORY is a derived file, really; you should be patching release.sgml
I think, not HISTORY.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-02 21:23:27 Re: HISTORY fixes
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2002-10-02 16:42:51 Re: AIX compilation problems (was Re: [HACKERS] Proposal ...)