Re: [PATCH] immediately kill psql process if server is not running.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Cc: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath(dot)reddy(at)zohocorp(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] immediately kill psql process if server is not running.
Date: 2025-01-18 22:31:43
Message-ID: 2609931.1737239503@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Anyway, I'm inclined to close this CF entry as returned-with-feedback.
> Perhaps there's something we can do here, but the current patch feels
> like a dead end.

Also, the submitter seems to have disappeared:

----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<srinath(dot)reddy(at)zohocorp(dot)com>
(reason: 550 5.1.1 <srinath(dot)reddy(at)zohocorp(dot)com> User unknown)

----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mx.zohocorp.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<srinath(dot)reddy(at)zohocorp(dot)com>
<<< 550 5.1.1 <srinath(dot)reddy(at)zohocorp(dot)com> User unknown
550 5.1.1 <srinath(dot)reddy(at)zohocorp(dot)com>... User unknown
>>> DATA
<<< 503 No recipients specified
451 4.4.1 reply: read error from mx.zohocorp.com.

So I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for a reply.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2025-01-18 23:42:50 Re: improve DEBUG1 logging of parallel workers for CREATE INDEX?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-01-18 22:25:11 Re: [PATCH] immediately kill psql process if server is not running.