| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | JDBC now needs updates for large objects |
| Date: | 2000-10-24 01:57:47 |
| Message-ID: | 26093.972352667@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Peter,
As of current sources, large objects no longer occupy tables named
'xinvNNNN' nor indexes named 'xinxNNNN'. Therefore, it'd be appropriate
to remove the special tests that exclude tables/indices named that way
from the tests in DatabaseMetaData.java. I have not done this because
I'm not in a position to test changes to the JDBC driver; would you
please add it to your todo list?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-24 01:59:20 | Re: TODO updates |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-24 01:53:50 | TODO updates |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cedar Cox | 2000-10-24 07:42:27 | Re: new maintainer for the ODBC driver? |
| Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2000-10-23 23:44:41 | Re: RE: datetime fix |