| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "D(dot) Duccini" <duccini(at)backpack(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Beth Gatewood <bethg(at)mbt(dot)washington(dot)edu>, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql -e |
| Date: | 2000-11-02 17:59:17 |
| Message-ID: | 26057.973187957@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
"D. Duccini" <duccini(at)backpack(dot)com> writes:
> other suggestions:
> 1. upgrade :P
> 2. try getting a newer version of just psql ?
> 3. have someone else run the queries and give you the output ?
Or
4. Run postmaster with -d2 and look in postmaster log to see what
psql is doing.
5. Read the psql source code to see what queries it will emit.
Suggestions 2 & 3 might not work so well, since the system catalogs
tend to change somewhat from release to release, and psql's queries
get adjusted appropriately. A query generated by a several-versions-
newer psql might not work as desired on Beth's 6.3 installation.
I like suggestion #1 myself ;-). 6.3 is roughly late Neolithic in
Postgres years...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ghaverla | 2000-11-03 17:06:48 | Compiling 7.0.2 and this mailing list |
| Previous Message | D. Duccini | 2000-11-02 17:37:21 | Re: psql -e |