Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Date: 2019-04-30 04:37:33
Message-ID: 26051.1556599053@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I've pushed the master bits, and the other branches are running
> check-world right now and I'll push soon unless something breaks (it's a
> bit annoying that <= 9.6 can't run check-world in parallel...).

Seems like putting reindexes of pg_class into a test script that runs
in parallel with other DDL wasn't a hot idea.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-04-30 04:44:26 Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-04-30 03:03:42 Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6