Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2015-11-27 04:39:35
Message-ID: 26039.1448599175@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> On 26-11-2015 14:06, YUriy Zhuravlev wrote:
>> I meant that support for older versions of CMake I'll do when will implement
>> other functions.

> I think you don't understand the point: start with the *right* cmake
> version because you could have to redo (a lot of) your work or have your
> patch rejected because you don't follow our advice.

The way Yuriy wants to do it is not necessarily wrong. He might end up
with cleaner code if he starts by making a cmake-3 implementation and then
figures out how to back-port to cmake-2, rather than starting with the
more limited language to begin with.

Or maybe not. But I doubt it's open and shut.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-11-27 05:07:52 Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-11-27 04:30:53 Re: Errors in our encoding conversion tables