From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "thimoty(at)thimoty(dot)it" <thimoty(at)thimoty(dot)it>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: stale temporary tables |
Date: | 2002-10-04 19:33:06 |
Message-ID: | 26038.1033759986@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> thimoty(at)thimoty(dot)it wrote:
>> i don't know if there is a quicker way, but i ended up in having
>> 40,000 or so
>> stale temp tables from a Java application which is using postgres as
>> backend.
> Lost temp tables should never happen, but they sometimes do because of
> backend crashes.
I was wondering how he got to that state, too. If it was because of
crashes, he must have had an awful lot of crashes.
> I have worked on a patch to auto-delete them, but it
> was rejected and we can't come up with a good way to do it. I think
> this is fixed in 7.3.
7.3 is better anyway: a backend crash can still leave temp tables
behind, but they'll be cleaned up the next time some backend tries
to use the same pg_temp_NNN schema.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-04 19:34:54 | Re: DTOI4 integer out of range |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-04 19:24:24 | Re: DTOI4 integer out of range |