Re: Another release note?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another release note?
Date: 2003-10-23 02:58:26
Message-ID: 26037.1066877906@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Is it worth mentioning this as a compatibility issue?
> "Prior to PostgreSQL 7.3, serial implied UNIQUE. This is no longer
> automatic. If you wish a serial column to be in a unique constraint or a
> primary key, it must now be specified, same as with any other data type."

Er, that *was* a compatibility issue. For 7.3.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-23 03:12:28 Re: Another release note?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-23 02:53:47 Another release note?