Re: Two-phase commit issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two-phase commit issues
Date: 2005-05-20 16:46:31
Message-ID: 26029.1116607591@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Uh, that's more or less the entire *POINT*. Once an open transaction is
>> prepared, it's supposed to survive a server crash.

> Wow. This is much more than I thought we were going to do.

If we tried to claim that anything less was two-phase commit, we'd be
laughed off the face of the planet ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-20 16:57:42 Re: Two-phase commit issues
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-20 16:34:53 Re: Two-phase commit issues