Re: Some new list.c primitives

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Swan <thomas(dot)swan(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some new list.c primitives
Date: 2005-07-28 18:42:50
Message-ID: 26018.1122576170@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Swan <thomas(dot)swan(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 7/28/05, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> How about list_append_distinct and list_concat_distinct?

>> Those names are fine with me.

> list_append_unique and list_concat_unique might be a little clearer, unless
> you want to retain the sqlism of distinct.

I like those too --- sold, unless anyone objects?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-07-28 20:41:27 Re: Interesting COPY edge case...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-07-28 18:33:27 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Basic documentation for ROLEs.