Re: Expand applicability of aggregate's sortop optimization

From: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Expand applicability of aggregate's sortop optimization
Date: 2024-12-28 04:24:17
Message-ID: 25ccb868-d610-40bf-9f3b-f757b1da3fa3@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/11/24 07:22, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 01:05:04PM +0700, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
>> Rebase onto current master and slight improvement.
>
> Your patch is failing in the CI, please rebase. I have it to the next
> CF for now, waiting on author.
Thanks,
I overlooked the fact that regression tests can be launched in parallel.
Therefore, adding an index to the frequently used tenk1 table was a bad
idea.
In the attachment - the new patch rebased on the current master.

--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Add-prosupport-helpers-to-aggregate-functions.patch text/x-patch 28.7 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2024-12-28 05:45:46 Re: Proposal: add new API to stringinfo
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2024-12-28 04:17:59 Re: Logging parallel worker draught