Re: Worries about delayed-commit semantics

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Worries about delayed-commit semantics
Date: 2007-06-22 15:10:59
Message-ID: 25F22682-3D01-48BA-8037-6BE6E7198F88@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Jun 22, 2007, at 9:23 , Richard Huxton wrote:

> Or perhaps "sync_on_commit = off"?

Or switch it around...

sink_on_commit = on

(sorry for the noise)

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-06-22 15:24:31 Re: tsearch in core patch
Previous Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-06-22 15:08:44 Re: Worries about delayed-commit semantics