Re: [HACKERS] Pretty bad bug in Postgres.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Bitmead <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pretty bad bug in Postgres.
Date: 1999-06-07 22:52:37
Message-ID: 25974.928795957@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Bitmead <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
>> Following is I believe evidence of a pretty bad bug in postgres. This is
>> the 990329 snapshot.

>> httpd=> insert into category(name, image, parent) SELECT 'boo', 'boo',
>> oid FROM category* where name = 'foo';
>> INSERT 158370 1
>> httpd=> select * from category;
>> name |image|url|parent
>> --------+-----+---+------
>> foo |foo | | 0
>> bar |bar | |158321
>> Products|.gif | |
>> (3 rows)

>> Ok, what's going on here. The 'boo' record did not appear!

Chris, I can't reproduce this here anymore --- do you still see it with
current sources?

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-06-07 22:56:33 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade problem
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 1999-06-07 22:35:42 pg_upgrade loses all data