Re: Warning on certain configuration file changes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Warning on certain configuration file changes
Date: 2006-01-07 04:38:27
Message-ID: 25972.1136608707@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I have developed a patch that writes a warning in the server log when a user
> changes a restart-only parameter in the configuration file and does a reload.
> The problem is that you will see this warning once for each running server
> process (unless you sent the HUP signal only to a specific process). Do
> people feel that the warning should only be written once by the postmaster
> process?

Yes. There is precedent already, see the existing code in
ProcessConfigFile:

/*
* To avoid cluttering the log, only the postmaster bleats loudly
* about problems with the config file.
*/
elevel = IsUnderPostmaster ? DEBUG2 : LOG;

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-07 04:52:31 Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-01-07 04:38:00 Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT