From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Liraz Siri <liraz(at)turnkeylinux(dot)org>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance] |
Date: | 2008-12-10 03:34:56 |
Message-ID: | 25939.1228880096@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> So, can you forward us the name & e-mail of a designated technical
> contact at TurnKey?
Liraz stated that they don't package PG themselves, just redistribute
the Ubuntu package quasi-automatically. So they have no need to be on
pgsql-packagers.
I'm a bit bemused by what our standards for linking ought to be in a
case like this. I still don't like the notion of "we'll link to anyone
who asks", but I can't quite see what higher standard should be imposed
for a redistribution.
(BTW, do we have Ubuntu's packager on pgsql-packagers? I've forgotten.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guido Barosio | 2008-12-10 04:03:02 | Re: Pootle server request |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-12-10 03:13:06 | Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance] |