| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> | 
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: "make install" now tries to build the documentation | 
| Date: | 2009-08-18 17:43:52 | 
| Message-ID: | 25938.1250617432@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On tis, 2009-08-18 at 12:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It happens for me on my Fedora box, but not on my HPUX box.
> Assuming no tool bugs, the only way I can see this happening is if you
> already have built the documentation.  Then, make install might cause it
> to be re-built if dependencies require it.
Um, that might be it.  I did what I usually do:
	make distclean
	cvs update
	configure ...
	make
	make install
but now that you mention it, I might have built the docs in that
tree yesterday, and "make distclean" no longer cleans them out.
[ checks overnight backups ... ] Yup, that's it: html/ and html-stamp
were present in doc/src/sgml/ early this morning.
I could avoid the unwanted build by changing the first step to
"make maintainer-clean", but that's not tremendously satisfactory
either, given how slow it is to regenerate the derived ecpg files.
Is it sensible to split out docs installation to a separate target
"make install-docs"?  Or is there some other solution?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-08-18 17:48:57 | Re: PQgetlength vs. octet_length() | 
| Previous Message | Michael Clark | 2009-08-18 17:39:30 | PQgetlength vs. octet_length() |