| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |
| Date: | 2021-03-13 07:00:55 |
| Message-ID: | 2592090.1615618855@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On Mar 12, 2021, at 10:36 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> You might think about using some symmetric-but-not-zero value,
>> 0x01010101 or the like.
> I thought about that, but I'm not sure that it proves much more than just using zero.
Perhaps not. I haven't really looked at any of this code, so I'll defer
to Robert's judgment about whether this represents an interesting testing
issue.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2021-03-13 07:19:13 | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |
| Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-03-13 06:55:11 | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |