Re: [Proposal] Level4 Warnings show many shadow vars

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ranier Vilela <ranier_gyn(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Level4 Warnings show many shadow vars
Date: 2019-12-05 23:41:24
Message-ID: 25917.1575589284@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 12/3/19 5:24 PM, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>> Any comments?

> I suggested increasing the default warnings in an email some time ago,
> to which Tom made reasonable objections.

Yes, that whole thread is worth a read in this context:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEepm%3D15e9L695yVCO-_OkBVbsPupyXqzYWzzDmj-bdJ6o2%2BPw%40mail.gmail.com

The original concern about --disable-integer-datetimes is history
now, but I think the variability of error reports between compilers
is still instructive and relevant.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-12-05 23:45:29 Re: Corruption with duplicate primary key
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-12-05 23:34:37 Re: Corruption with duplicate primary key