From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing |
Date: | 2006-11-05 18:28:34 |
Message-ID: | 25914.1162751314@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After re-reading the above, it strikes me that maybe names based around
>> "freeze_min" and "freeze_max" would be useful?
> Works for me. They are clearly related, yet different and allow a
> straightforward explanation of their need and use.
Sold, I'll rename them before committing the patch.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2006-11-05 19:23:59 | NULL in arrays |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-05 18:24:55 | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-11-05 19:47:28 | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-05 18:24:55 | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing |