Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file
Date: 2007-10-22 21:05:21
Message-ID: 25899.1193087121@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> At least if we think it's more than a very narrow legitimate use, compared
>> to the number of ppl making the mistake.

> Did we ever come to a conclusion on this or not? I've changed my patch
> per the suggestions in the thread, but I've held back on committing it
> to hear arguments... Go or no-go?

I'm inclined to vote no-go on the message. AFAIR we've only heard the
one complaint about this, so I'm not convinced there's a lot of people
making such a mistake. We did make the logic change to deal with the
underlying problem of a misleading error message after you'd done it,
and I think that might be enough.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-10-22 21:08:55 Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-10-22 20:45:02 Re: [HACKERS] 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit