From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file |
Date: | 2007-10-22 21:05:21 |
Message-ID: | 25899.1193087121@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> At least if we think it's more than a very narrow legitimate use, compared
>> to the number of ppl making the mistake.
> Did we ever come to a conclusion on this or not? I've changed my patch
> per the suggestions in the thread, but I've held back on committing it
> to hear arguments... Go or no-go?
I'm inclined to vote no-go on the message. AFAIR we've only heard the
one complaint about this, so I'm not convinced there's a lot of people
making such a mistake. We did make the logic change to deal with the
underlying problem of a misleading error message after you'd done it,
and I think that might be enough.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-10-22 21:08:55 | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-10-22 20:45:02 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit |