Re: [HACKERS] BUG #2873: Function that returns an empty set

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #2873: Function that returns an empty set
Date: 2007-01-09 16:27:20
Message-ID: 25886.65.211.31.251.1168360040.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> This is closely related to the discussion a couple weeks ago about how
> a LEFT JOIN could produce nulls in an output column that was labeled as
> having a non-null-domain type. We haven't figured out what is a sane
> behavior for that case, either. I'm beginning to think that domains
> constrained not null are just fundamentally a bad idea.
>

I think we just expect left joins to produce nulls regardless of
constraints on the underlying cols, don't we? Concluding that not null in
domains is bad seems a bit drastic.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-01-09 18:08:55 Re: BUG #2875: pgAdmin III docs installed even if app is not
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-09 14:56:23 Re: [HACKERS] BUG #2873: Function that returns an empty set with a 'not null' domain errors in 8.2 but not 8.1

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2007-01-09 16:31:59 Re: Autovacuum Improvements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-09 14:56:23 Re: [HACKERS] BUG #2873: Function that returns an empty set with a 'not null' domain errors in 8.2 but not 8.1