From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Release Notes Archive Patch |
Date: | 2019-02-13 16:18:22 |
Message-ID: | 25885.1550074702@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On 2/13/19 10:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The patch doesn't convey a lot to my mind, so I have to ask: exactly
>> what URLs would this present?
> I'm a bit confuse by the question, so I'll answer it from two angles.
Neither of those are quite what I meant. As I understood Andres'
complaint, it was that right now we have URLs like
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/release-9-6-5.html
but those are going to be 404 beginning tomorrow. It sounds from your
response like this patch isn't meant to restore those cross-version URLs.
Which is fine by me, really, but we might get pushback about it. If so,
there might be material for follow-on work to redirect those into this
new set of URLs.
> WRT loading the release notes themselves, basically it is using the data
> found in the current doc imports. Often in the release notes, there are
> URLs either to older release notes (like in the top line) or various
> features/sections of the documentation (e.g. a GUC, a SQL command, etc.)
Right. The latter type will link to the main docs for the associated
release, correct?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2019-02-13 16:23:41 | Re: Release Notes Archive Patch |
Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2019-02-13 15:21:04 | Re: Release Notes Archive Patch |