From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | nolan(at)celery(dot)tssi(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org (pgsql general list) |
Subject: | Re: This mail list and its policies |
Date: | 2003-09-20 17:39:00 |
Message-ID: | 25857.1064079540@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
nolan(at)celery(dot)tssi(dot)com writes:
> Also, I DO run spamassassin here, and it is finding only perhaps 10-20%
> of the copies of the most recent worm. I think it sends out copies that
> are sufficiently different from each other that it bypasses all the
> checks, including a Bayesian filter.
Hmm. I've had no trouble filtering the actual worm (I filter using a
pattern that looks for the first few bytes of a base64-encoded Windows
executable file). The only copies that were getting as far as my spam
inbox were ones that had had the executable file removed by various
"helpful" filtering programs.
> I hope there is a special corner of hell reserved for spammers and an
> even worse corner reserved for virus/worm writers.
And "antivirus" writers whose work increases the noise level instead of
reducing it. They should know better than to bounce back complaint
messages to the From: line when they have recognized a worm that is
known to forge From:.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-20 17:42:19 | Re: 7.3.2 client connecting to 7.2.1 server problem |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-20 17:22:00 | Re: State of Beta 2 |