From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu> |
Cc: | pawel(at)freebsd(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14643: Fails to compile with LibreSSL >= 2.5.3 |
Date: | 2017-05-04 19:35:22 |
Message-ID: | 25848.1493926522@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
=?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu> writes:
> On 2017-05-04 20:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This looks like it was probably addressed by the changes we made last
>> month to support OpenSSL 1.1.0 in our pre-9.5 branches. However, since
>> LibreSSL isn't identical to OpenSSL, it would sure be nice if someone
>> would verify compatibility before next week's update releases. Could
>> you test against our git branch tips or nightly snapshot tarballs?
> For what it's worth my build farm animal loach is running FreeBSD 10.3
> with LibreSSL 2.4.5 and it's running all branches from 9.2 to HEAD
> without complaining.
> It's not the newest version of LibreSSL though.
Right. loach wasn't complaining before we made those fixes, either.
I'm guessing that Pawel is working with a bleeding-edge LibreSSL that
has adopted API changes similar to OpenSSL 1.1.0. The question now
is whether they're similar enough that our current code will work.
As I said, it'd be nice to find out this week not next week ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mikael Kjellström | 2017-05-04 19:42:34 | Re: BUG #14643: Fails to compile with LibreSSL >= 2.5.3 |
Previous Message | Mikael Kjellström | 2017-05-04 19:20:21 | Re: BUG #14643: Fails to compile with LibreSSL >= 2.5.3 |