From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior |
Date: | 2015-06-30 13:45:08 |
Message-ID: | 25845.1435671908@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 07:00:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Another idea would be to make a test during postmaster start to see
>> if this bug exists, and fail if so. I'm generally on board with the
>> thought that we don't need to work on systems with such a bad bug,
>> but it would be a good thing if the failure was clean and produced
>> a helpful error message, rather than looking like a Postgres bug.
> Failing cleanly on unpatched Solaris is adequate, agreed. A check at
> postmaster start isn't enough, because the postmaster might run in the C
> locale while individual databases or collations use problem locales. The
> safest thing is to test after every setlocale(LC_COLLATE) and
> newlocale(LC_COLLATE). That's once at backend start and once per backend per
> collation used, more frequent than I would like. Hmm.
I was thinking more along the lines of making a single test by momentarily
switching into a known-buggy locale.
However, your results here imply that there are or were more than one bug
with this symptom, which may make a catchall test impossible.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shulgin, Oleksandr | 2015-06-30 14:42:44 | Re: Streaming replication for psycopg2 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-06-30 13:38:23 | 9.5 branch splitoff |