From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: relfilenode |
Date: | 2005-10-28 02:03:42 |
Message-ID: | 25827.1130465022@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> The docs have this description for pg_class::relfilenode: "Name of the
> on-disk file of this relation; 0 if none". However, Elein just pointed
> out to me that there are no entries with 0, so this description seems
> incorrect. What should we say? It appears that in at least some of these
> cases the value is the same as the oid.
My opinion is that the documentation is right and the code is wrong ;-)
It's a bad idea to have valid-looking relfilenodes in entries that are
not describing real on-disk structures --- not least because such values
could by chance match on-disk files that actually exist, but belong to a
different pg_class entry.
This is probably just a matter of laziness somewhere in heap.c.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-28 02:14:15 | Re: enums |
Previous Message | Trent Shipley | 2005-10-28 01:58:21 | Re: enums |