Re: postgreSQL : duplicate DB names

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Khangelani Gama <kgama(at)argility(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgreSQL : duplicate DB names
Date: 2014-05-26 15:34:36
Message-ID: 25786.1401118476@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 26 May 2014, at 10:28, Khangelani Gama <kgama(at)argility(dot)com> wrote:
>> It's psql 8.0.4, OS is Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike

> 8.0.4? That went EOL almost 4 years ago and even then you should be running a version around 8.0.26. Youre 22 bugfix releases behind, which likely includes fixes for several data-corruption issues.
> See: http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/

8.0.x did not have any real defenses against transaction ID wraparound
(the behavior of forcing a shutdown when wraparound gets too close was
added in 8.1, and there was no built-in autovacuum back then either).
So my money is on this being a wraparound problem, ie, some dead but
never-vacuumed pg_database row has returned to visibility because its
deleting transaction is now "in the future".

If you're very lucky, vacuuming pg_database will fix it. But take a
backup *first*, in case you're not lucky and vacuuming makes things worse.
I'd shut down the postmaster and then make a physical copy (tarball) of
the whole data directory tree, just to be sure you can get back to where
you are.

As a former Red Hatter, I cannot resist making the point that your OS
version is even hoarier than your PG version, and is certainly full of
since-fixed bugs. You are *years* overdue for some serious attention to
software updates.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G Johnston 2014-05-26 17:14:32 Re: Trouble running nested select - Join query
Previous Message Zhemin Zhou 2014-05-26 12:00:22 memory leaking ?