Re: pl/pgsql Composite Parameter Question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: cnliou(at)eurosport(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql Composite Parameter Question
Date: 2002-03-08 01:30:08
Message-ID: 25778.1015551008@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am confused how this relates to the 16-parameter limit mentioned in
> the message.

It is not related. I had suggested to cnliou that he might avoid
passing a rowtype parameter in favor of passing all the columns
separately --- but he needed more than 16 to do it that way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eel 2002-03-08 01:42:00 Converting/formatting timestamp arithmetic
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-08 01:24:36 Re: pl/pgsql Composite Parameter Question