Re: Have vacuum emit a warning when it runs out of maintenance_work_mem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Have vacuum emit a warning when it runs out of maintenance_work_mem
Date: 2007-05-12 19:45:32
Message-ID: 25774.1178999132@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Or we could switch to a more compact representation of the dead tuples,
> and not need such a big maintenance_work_mem in the first place.

Hm, you got any ideas? One constraint is that it doesn't seem
acceptable to make the search function any slower.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2007-05-12 21:03:53 Re: Have vacuum emit a warning when it runs out of maintenance_work_mem
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-05-12 18:57:44 Re: Have vacuum emit a warning when it runs out of maintenance_work_mem