| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby |
| Date: | 2009-11-15 23:38:18 |
| Message-ID: | 25760.1258328298@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Nov 15, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I agree with Heikki that it would be better not to commit as long as
>> any clear showstoppers remain unresolved.
> If ever there were an argument for topic branches, *this is it*.
How so? They've got a perfectly good topic branch, ie, the external
git repository they're already working in. If the branch were within
core CVS it would accomplish exactly nothing more as far as easing the
eventual merge.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Emmanuel Cecchet | 2009-11-15 23:41:15 | Re: Partitioning option for COPY |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-11-15 23:34:31 | Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby |