From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Set log_line_prefix and application name in test drivers |
Date: | 2016-08-27 19:59:35 |
Message-ID: | 25757.1472327975@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> writes:
> I've always been wondering why we don't set a log_line_prefix by
> default.
I think the odds of getting to something that everyone would agree on
are nil, so I'm not excited about getting into that particular
bikeshed-painting discussion. Look at the amount of trouble we're
having converging on a default for the regression tests, which are
a far narrower use-case than "everybody".
> The above looks quite similar to what the Debian packages have been
> setting as their default for some time, with standard stderr logging:
I think Debian's choice was probably made by fiat, not by consensus.
Packagers seem to be able to get away with quite a lot in that regard.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-08-27 21:48:29 | Re: Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-08-27 19:50:49 | Re: Bogus sizing parameters in some AllocSetContextCreate calls |